So, I’ve just about managed to catch my breath and take a closer look at the data I collated on Sunday. This will give us a good idea of how the parties stood at the start of the election campaign, and possibly give us an idea of how they will fare.
At the outset, the overall stats:
Of 212k Facebook accounts connected to declared candidates:
Fianna Fáil, 16%; Fine Gael, 27%; Labour; 16%; Sinn Féin, 21%; Greens, 4%; ULA, 4%; Independents/Others, 11%
Of the 102k Twitter accounts connected to declared candidates:
Fianna Fáil, 8%; Fine Gael, 27%; Labour; 20%; Sinn Féin, 4%; Greens, 26%; ULA, 6%; Independents/Others, 9%
I’m not going to go into the ins-and-outs of these numbers, but if you take a look in the newspapers, for all the criticisms that social media polling might get, it’s pretty obvious that those numbers are pretty much in the same neck of the woods as both door-to-door and telephone polling. Anyway, to the parties….
Fianna Fáil
I don’t think that FF need be very worried about their low (8%) Twitter support, as this is a smaller arena, and is clearly more liberal/left leaning and they can dismiss it with arguments of incumbency and so on. I could only find 25 FF tweeting candidates, who had an average of 345 followers each, with a total of 8618 followers. It’s a pitifully low level of activity, but then it’s a probably a pitifully low level of effort too.
What should be of more concern is the low level of support on Facebook (16%), which is a much bigger arena. The thing is, that Fianna Fáil is doing reasonably well on Facebook in some respects: 41 accounts, 34k fans/friends, meaning an average of 827 per candidate which is one of the higher rates, compared to the other parties. But it’s still only on a share of 16%, which means that, as much as their HQ might dislike them, those poll ratings in the mid-teens are probably quite accurate, and probably won’t shift much either. No evidence of a ‘shy Tory’ here.
Fine Gael
In some ways, the support levels for Fine Gael are more interesting than those of any other party. There is clearly a concerted effort by their HQ to use social media, as they have 71 Twitter accounts and 85 Facebook accounts. However, it doesn’t seem to be having much effect: average 394 Twitter followers (not much more than FF), average 675 Facebook friends/fans (considerably less than FF). Overall, they are at 27% of the total share in either medium, which also sounds like they may be at their peak of their total social media support share. It’s also worth bearing in mind that in the 2007 General Election, Fine Gael achieved that same percentage of the popular vote…
Labour
Social media has been reasonably kind to Labour, almost by accident. I’ve often grumbled about how several Labour TDs had Twitter accounts, but had never tweeted, and for some that is still the case, even now in the campaign, but that hasn’t stopped them from picking up bucketloads of followers: 44 accounts, with an average of 460 followers, giving a total of 20k followers or a 20% share. Not bad at all, though not a Dáil majority. Of some concern should be their 16% level in the Facebook constituency, where they are, at 604, below FF and FG in terms of average number of friends/fans per account. But they can be confident that their support levels will hold on or above the same level as those of Fianna Fáil.
Sinn Féin
For me, the revelation of this research thus far. When I looked at Twittering TDs a few months ago, Sinn Féin weren’t at the races at all, and in fact they still aren’t really, but their Facebook performance is phenomenal. While on Twitter, they are well below expectations, and averages, with only 17 accounts, with an average of 264 followers, giving a total of 4.5k or a share of 4%, on Facebook things are very different: 33 accounts, 45k friends/fans, with an average of 1375 per account, giving them a share of 21%. Bear in mind two points: one, 21% of first preferences could give Sinn Féin 30 seats; and two, when Pearse Doherty walked home in Donegal South-West, he had about 2,200 friends and mounted a concerted campaign on Facebook. They’ve obviously learnt that lesson, and it may yet pay major dividends.
Greens
Old hands at social media, the Green Party pretty much owns the Twittersphere. If their share there (26%) translated into vote share, then they could take the next three weeks off as all their candidates would walk home. However, even though their 10 accounts have a phenomenal average of 2624 followers, it’s quite clear that these numbers don’t mean much – as evidence by their failure to channel that support into Facebook. In that sphere, their 15 accounts have an average of 563 friends or fans, which is lower than all the other major parties. Can’t see them doing much above their share there of 4%.
Independents (incorporating ULA and others)
Wholly a mixed bag, by any interpretation. The United Left Alliance is at about 4% share in Facebook, and 6% in Twitter, but that is largely comprised of their ‘headline’ candidates like Joe Higgins and Richard Boyd-Barrett, so while they are in contention for seats, from the social media perspective, it’s hard to see it elsewhere.
In terms of the Independents, there is wide variation: from ‘traditional’ independents, to ex-major party independents, to ‘econo-independents’ and. There are those with absolutely no social media presence, to those posting what they’re having for dinner, with cartoon avatars, and much more besides. The critical point is for the likes of the celebrity economists, is that while they may have amassed a large Twitter following, they may have trouble, like the Greens, in translating that onto Facebook, which to my mind, is a better indicator. In that respect, it will be interesting to see how the very social media savvy campaigns, of which Dylan Haskins is probably the only one, get on at the ballot box.
And that’s the lot for now. Will revise the numbers over the weekend for the first evidence of trends. With the greatest of respect, to the ultimate arbitrator – you, the voter,
Ciarán